“How many of you would really like to do a good job at work?” For the past 20 years we have been asking employees of organizations around the world the same question. The resounding answer from more than 99% of them was that they indeed wanted to do a good job. Upon further discussion with them they said that they not only wanted to do a good job but a great job!

During the same 20 years we have been polling senior executives and asking them if they were pleased with their organization’s strategy and the vast majority responded that they were. We then asked how satisfied they were with the organization’s implementation and execution of the strategy and fewer than 15% of those polled reported that they were satisfied with how their strategy was being implemented. These statistics confirm those reported by the Conference Board, Norton and Kaplan and other organizations that monitor such phenomenon.

Why is it that the vast majority of employees want to do a great job and yet fewer than 15% of executives are satisfied with how their strategy is being implemented and executed? What causes such a gap in performance? Our research has found that there are several reasons for this performance gap. The most commonly mentioned reasons are:

  • Employees don’t understand and in many cases don’t even know what the organization endeavors to accomplish—the organization’s vision or mission.
  • Employees don’t know or understand how the vision relates to them and what they do in their jobs.
  • Employees don’t know what is most important for them to do in their jobs that will move the organization closer to its vision.
  • Employees have too many job priorities at the same time—and if everything is a priority then nothing is a priority!

In a sentence, employees are unable to “operationalize” the vision or mission . . . despite being highly motivated to do so!

The Group Performance Associates (GPa) approach to addressing these issues is quite straightforward and simple—but not necessarily easy.

“Performance Management” The GPa Approach

The GPa approach goes directly to the veritable “DNA” of the organization—its values. When we refer to values we refer to far more than the moral and ethical values of the organization. We focus more on the operating or intellectual values. 

These are the priorities that are necessary for the organization to realize its vision or mission on a day-to-day basis. Once these are identified we are able to make them explicit to everyone in the organization who we then help to operationalize the priorities. Operationalizing priorities means converting an important priority into actions and behaviors that enable the organization to accomplish a specific goal. By making the priorities operational for each employee, every employee can readily see how their priorities relate to the vision or mission of the organization, thus creating clear line of sight to the vision. More importantly each employee then knows specifically the most important thing that they must do to accomplish the goal.

Through our performance management process you can learn to build a high-performance work environment and effectively manage change. We welcome the opportunity to discuss working with your organization in developing a custom “Performance Management” process to meet your needs.

Are you ready to transition from a successful business to a business that has a positive impact on society and the world -a significant business?

Let’s start by understanding how organizations transform and evolve through as many as seven distinct stages – ranging from survival to making a global contribution. Each of these stages builds upon one another and a particular focus that is important for that particular stage of development. For example in the survival stage an organization must focus on generating cash flow and profitability. Once that goal is met it must be sustained but the focus then shifts to the next stage of development.

Along with each stage of development that an organization evolves through there is a corresponding stage of leader development. Each stage of leader development specifies requisite developmental priorities, competencies and skills. Each stage also suggests a perspective or worldview as well as the progress of a leader’s psychological and spiritual journey.

It is important to note that while we use the terms “evolve” and “evolution” this does NOT mean that these changes occur naturally or without intention and purpose. The transformation of an organization requires a plan, a shift in culture and specific competencies at each stage.

Online presentation “The evolution of organizations”

business_direction

What stage is your organization in and do you have the leadership skills necessary to progress to the next level?

Our Values & Vision tool can help you get started – Click here

If there is one thing that companies are learning in the current economic crisis, it is the importance of resilience – the ability to withstand and overcome business, economic, and societal shocks. The most resilient companies display the following characteristics:

  • A shared set of values
  • A commitment to the common good
  • A high level of staff engagement, and
  • A shared vision of the future

These are qualities that lead to internal cohesion. What the current crisis is showing us is that organizations that are strong on the inside are also strong on the outside. Being strong on the inside means having a values-driven core culture and a highly aligned and effective leadership team.

What are Values, and Why are They Important?

Values are deeply held principles that drive people’s behaviors. Organizations express their values through their working culture, and research strongly link financial performance with the alignment of organizational operating values and employees’ personal values. Who you are and what you stand for has become just as important as the quality of your products and services.

In Corporate Culture and Performance, John P. Kotter and James L. Heskett reveal that companies with strong adaptive cultures based on shared values outperform other companies significantly. During an eleven-year period, companies emphasizing all stakeholders grew four-times faster than companies that did not. Their job creation rates were seven times higher, stock prices grew 12 times faster, and profit performance was 750 times higher than companies that did not have shared values and adaptive cultures.

In Built to Last, Jim Collins and Jerry Porras note that over several decades companies that consistently focused on building strong corporate cultures outperformed companies that did not by a factor of six and outperformed the general stock market by a factor of 15.

John P. Kotter and James L. Heskett, Corporate Culture and Performance, (New York: The Free Press) 1992
James C. Collins and Jerry I. Porras, Built to Last, Successful Habits of Visionary Conies (New York: Harper Collins) 1994.
Source: Email correspondence with Richard Barrett, January 6, 2009.

Change

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

The biggest difference between management and leadership? The desired outcome. The desired outcome of managment is order and predictability- the desired outcome of leadershp is change. What is your vision and who do you want to create value for in the long run? How do you begin to effect change that moves your organization toward your vision? Change for the leadership team is intimately tied to change for the company.  Effecting significant change, and how we change in the process. Identifying positive and effective change.

DesignShop Explained

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

Greg Metzler outlines some of the benefits of DesignShop ; what it’s for, who should attend, what kind of results you can expect.

This video explains something about what a “DesignShop” is about. No two DesignShops are alike- but the results they produce can have a global impact.

« Older entries